Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead.
It is true that people hold different opinions about the extent to which wild animals should be protected. While it is difficult to justify the protection of every wild animal. I believe that some wild animals ought to be protected.
On the one hand, some people put forward the moral argument that humans have no right to kill any animal in the wild. They argue that it is a violation of animal rights. They believe that it is necessary for everyone to treat animals humanely, and they correctly condemn the forms of animal exploitation, animal suffering and even animal slaughter in the world today. For example, animal lovers will argue the need to eliminate poaching on elephants in Africa or India, and to establish a wildlife reserves. In terms of oceans, there is an international campaign an end to the practice of whaling
On the other hand, I tend to agree with those who argue that only animals on the brink of extinction should be protected. Their views combine practical and moral arguments. Although they recognize the ethical dilemmas, they believe that the numbers species of animals must be regulated. Rats, for example, are everywhere and they are danger to human health, contaminating food and water and carrying diseases. If their numbers were not reduced, the consequences would be serious. Therefore, people should mainly be concerned with protecting race or endangered species of wild animals.
In et cart can conclusion, because it is impossible to protect every animal species of wild animals, I believe that be given priority to save species which are in becoming extinct Should danger of
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 76
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps show the library five years ago and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...which wild animals should be protected. While it is difficult to justify the protecti...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpaign an end to the practice of whaling On the other hand, I tend to agree with ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, for example, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02230483271 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66045327644 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546468401487 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3661304345 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482173274918 0.244688304435 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16847145536 0.084324248473 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12061592046 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323696962855 0.151304729494 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103757470905 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.