Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
There can be no doubt that the topic of phone usage deserves some analysis. It is this writer's opinion that phone prohibition helps children focus more on work and allowance to use phones enables them to better socialize. From another perspective, youngsters should be permitted to use phones at their disposal.
On the one hand, disallowing phone possession may increase work productivity. Smartphones are one of the principal sources of distraction, which often tempt kids to either play too many games or scroll through social media. Therefore, with the absence of mobile phones, children can easily pay concerted effort to cope with a demanding workload, namely working on school projects or maintaining excellent academic performance. Consequently, not only do they become more productive, but they also have extra time for leisure.
On the other hand, the freedom to use smartphones is conducive to extending social circles. As social beings in the modern age, children tend to long for a constant connection with their friends for both recreational and professional purposes such as catching up with a friend or discussing academic matters. This can be easily achieved via various social media apps on smartphones for instant messaging and video calls like Facebook and Instagram. For that reason, children's social life can be greatly enhanced.
From my standpoint, kids should be free to use phones by virtue of the convenience offered by virtual socializing. In this day and age, most children have a hectic schedule that requires them to handle a tremendous amount of work, ranging from domestic domain to their institutions, such as household chores and school projects. For better management, mobile phones are a viable alternative since they can provide virtual meeting apps like Google Meet and Zoom that help save more time. The outcome is that youngsters will not only have more time for themselves but also receive more life satisfaction.
It can be seen that although disallowing phone usage may help children better focus on their work, they should be able to use phones at their disposal for better social interactions and more free time.
- The charts below show the types of work occupied by people from Province A and Province B in England 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Memorising facts is the most important way to succeed in education To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crimes To what extent do you agree 89
- Some students work while studying This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...sage deserves some analysis. It is this writers opinion that phone prohibition helps ch...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26801152738 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78718901875 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559077809798 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4030241528 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313093567089 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110739675792 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097609486839 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205859873629 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113364316242 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.