Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend, while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
Global communication and commerce have brought many benefits to the land at the turn of the twenty-first century. On the one hand, it is supposed to help dissolve technological, economic, political, and cultural boundaries; on the contrary, it is said to undermine a nation's personality. Personally, I trust the first opinion more, as I shall explain in this essay.
Outsourcing is one of the negative consequences of globalization in which a country loses the majority of its jobs to foreign employees; an obvious example is the outsourcing of corporations from the United States to Indian BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) units. Another cause is the growing reliance on foreign brands over domestic equivalents; for example, imported chocolate chip cookies are consumed at a higher rate than domestically produced biscuits. One major explanation is attributed to social media, which has created an excessive need for foreign products in one's lifestyle. Such variables are viewed as a huge blow to a country's economy and producer morale, giving rise to the disputed claim.
However, the rate at which international trade is growing tells a different tale. In contrast to the negative effects outlined above, various benefits provided by individuals are encouraging global trade to expand. The global economy benefits from international trade. It adds to the world's overall wealth. Every country can save money by disposing of extra items after addressing the needs of the local people. As a result, people's salaries and lifestyles begin to rise naturally. A practical solution that does not require stopping globalization is to focus on its positive elements and seek to keep this phenomenon from becoming negative.
In conclusion, this topic is a favorable trend for global economies because it asserts that countries cannot exist in isolation. To sell their surplus products, they had to share their money, technical know-how, and business strategies. The global economy is interconnected. The economic progress of a country is determined by its relationships with other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-13 | harmankaur1203 | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Koi | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | cleee | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Huyle121212 | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Huyle121212 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays most people are moving and living in big cities Why is this happening Is this trend good or bad 89
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- Due to development and rapid expansion supermarkets in some countries many small local businesses are unable to compete some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree or dis 89
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 56
- Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...the contrary, it is said to undermine a nations personality. Personally, I trust the fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... excessive need for foreign products in ones lifestyle. Such variables are viewed as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46913580247 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10277763962 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5637771694 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140381172225 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399876725468 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386476244805 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807461826376 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497621223868 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.