Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception.
Employees play a pivotal role in the overall development of any organization. Presently, it is argued that older workforce is indispensable for the success of a corporation. However, others believe that young professionals bring more fruitful results for their workplace. Here, I would like to account for both views with my own opinion.
There are manifold points to shore up the former view. To begin with, grey haired employees are laced with years of valuable experience in their professional lives. For instance, they have already gone through various challenging scenarios while working, which they handled efficiently and achieved success for themselves and their companies as well. Hence, they are undoubtedly an honorable asset for the organization. Besides this, they are equipped with great leadership skills as they can effectively lead, manage and utilize their sub-ordinates in lieu of achieving desired outcomes. By contrast, the opposite wind is also present.
There are numerous reasons to support the latter view. Initially, young workforce is high on energy levels and is enthusiastic to work. To illustrate, beginners at the workplace are always eager to learn new skills and techniques and are looking forward to outperform their co-workers. As a result, growth of a company can definitely be assured under such capable employees. Furthermore, young blood is innovative and flexible in nature which helps them to understand and adapt the latest advancements in technology which have become phenomenal for the corporate success.
From my notion, both the views have their own significance. Undeniably, one cannot ignore the premium expertise brought in by the grey haired staff. However, the youth should be extended an opportunity to showcase their exceptional talents and skill sets for the overall betterment of the business.
To recapitulate, it is advisable for corporate to hire an appropriate mix of both young and matured workers in order to acquire encouraging outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-29 | nairanoop43 | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-09 | Rose sandhu12 | 89 | view |
| 2017-10-28 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 89 | view |
| 2017-10-27 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 70 | view |
| 2017-10-27 | Neha mehta | 89 | view |
- Major companies use sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 96
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a negative or a positive development? 89
- Some people say that government should build sport facilities for professional athletes Others believe that such facilities should be open to everyone Discuss both views with your opinion 72
- Nowadays congestion and traffic jam are a common problem in the cities. Some people believe that widening the roads can be a solution to this problem. Do you agree or disagree? What can be the solutions? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to outperforming'.
Suggestion: to outperforming
... and techniques and are looking forward to outperform their co-workers. As a result, growth o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51779935275 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00632791986 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624595469256 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0314236882 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7368421053 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2631578947 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10684222115 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346687307949 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442766487079 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630009180265 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496212948811 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.