Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people. Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped. Discuss both views.
These days, with the development of advanced technology, people can easily access more information about the private life of renowned people via mass media. Although revealing secrets lives can bring several benefits, I believe it is an immoral activity due to the natural right of everyone.
On the one hand, various reasons explain why mass media should invest in the private information of celebrities. The first reason is that the media and well-known people can gain their targets and profit from publishing secrets. For instance, many artists or singers like their private lives to be put on display in order to gain more public attention, increase sales or followers, and promote their work. Furthermore, fans can know more about personal details, and what has happened during their career. As a result, media can help people read the latest notifications which certainly meet all your needs.
On the other hand, I believe that it is wrong for society to accept the publishing of private information, which may cause unpredictable consequences. Firstly, many well-known people want to hide their privacy, so deliberately digging up secrets can have extreme influences on both physical and mental health. For example, celebrities suffer from negative comments and critics from fans on the Internet due to a dull past or immoral behavior. They can easily feel depressed and their career might be on the verge of failure. Nevertheless, privacy is one of the basic human rights, so humans should respect each other and treat others equally.
In conclusion, revealing other secrets is an impolite activity and should be restricted and controlled to protect their reputation and career.
- The bar chart gives information about the food loss and waste at the different stages of production in developed and developing countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 61
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The diagram details the process of making wool
- 11 07 2015 Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same To what extnet do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart gives information about the food loss and waste at different stages of production in developed and developing countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26296296296 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73479083895 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4561711909 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.307692308 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246234097254 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827034204156 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431335435963 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152003721463 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199629292233 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.