Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss these points of views. What is your opinion?
There are different views about how today's advanced technology can affect people's lives in terms of social level. While some argue that this affect is more towards to make an increasingly social gap between individuals, in my view, technology has been remarkably blurred the differences.
There is an underlying reason why some people consider modern technology as a key factor leading to make inequality. Proponent of this idea argue that the state-of-the-art facilities are such expensive that just minority of people in a society can afford them. Smart houses exclusively constructed according to their owner's requests are the living proof of an unachievable high-tech service for public. Another example is automatic cars which are much more costly than manual one. It is evident that not only are these advanced luxury devices extremely convenient, but also they are completely safe in comparison to usual one which is affordable for average people. This is the point that social gap demonstrates itself.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that applicable technologies are wildly accessible for public. In fact, the most effective and necessary advanced gadgets are made as if they are usable for majority of people; weather they are privileged or not. Mobile phone, as a clear example, used to be considered as a luxury equipment which just wealthy people could purchase it. However, today hardly can we find a person not having a smart phone, thanks to the technology progression. In addition, no matter how much is people's income, they have access to the Internet to take its advantages. As a result, level of social awareness among people belonging to various classes has been closed gradually.
In conclusion, although it seems that high-tech services lead to inequality, I am of the opinion that practical technology assist whole society to eliminate class distinctions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-20 | khanhbang | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | vishal sachdeva | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-03 | dhruv j patel | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | rababuuuuuuu | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | Mahesh04 | 81 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 77
- In many countries it is common for families to own and run their own business Some people think this is the best way to run a business while others consider this a potential source of problem What is your opinion 55
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30564784053 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88873822909 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3115656219 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227994046667 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696960089692 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388860997936 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124630030823 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477890137445 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.