Some people believe that schoolchildren should do their class work individually. Other people believe that sometimes class works should be done in small groups.
Opinions are divided on whether students should do their class exercise by themselves or by small teams.I personally agree with the latter.
Admittedly, there are good reasons to say that completing task assigned in the school individually offer two main advantages. First reason is that individual task can enhance independence for young pupils. When a physic teacher give them an equation or question to solve, they have to think by themselves and not to rely on anyone. This in turn, it means that young students improve the ability to handle individually so it will be useful for their future career. Secondly, it is easier and time-saving for one person complete the class exercise since the student gather concentration and fully decided to the whole process. Compared to collective tasks, teammates need to argue and reach a common point and wait for others finish their parts. For these reasons, it might seen better to work alone on classroom tasks.
However, there are stronger elements to believe that group work is more useful in implementing school exercise. Chief of these is that students can have opportunities to learns various such as teamwork skill, collaboration skills and negotiation skills. This is shown by a group of three or four pupils can solve a complicated job in shorter time with high effective job. In addition, collective task creates a chance to exchange ideas and knowledge and to finish quickly and effectively. The group can classify the task to each teammate so that all the task can be done at the same time.
In conclusion, although individual task provides students the capacity to live and work independently, there are more stronger reasons to support group work with many useful skills and effectiveness.
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011 67
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 43
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 78
- The graph show the annual income of language related jobs in US dollars in five cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant 78
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...xercise by themselves or by small teams.I personally agree with the latter. Ad...
^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have seen' or 'see'?
Suggestion: have seen; see
...heir parts. For these reasons, it might seen better to work alone on classroom tasks...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
... live and work independently, there are more stronger reasons to support group work with many...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1149825784 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78048343856 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5361111085 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199021773788 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606008242102 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575404226845 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127626689328 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038640944354 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.