some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people debate that there should be fixed and defined punishment for each kind of crime while, others discuss that motivations and context of each individual crime should be pondered. In my opinion, each case should be analyzed separately and the equivalent punishment regarding the context of crime must be delineated.
On the one hand, defining fixed punishment for a certain crime could improve the transparency of judging and reduce the probability of corruption among the judges and juries. Delinquents cannot bribe to judges because the consequence of their actions are clear and nobody can be exempted from that. Immutable punishment makes the process of judging shorter and faster and take the pressure off lawyers. Moreover, people know the exact consequence of their actions and they can prioritize their reactions by considering their discerned fines.
On the other hand, judging disregarding the context could be unjust. Sometime, people are led to commit a crime which they do not have any control on that. With this in mind, people in this situations are not as guilty as who intentionally do something criminal. In addition, people could be manipulated and deceived by others who are the true delinquent ones. Children, for example, can be easily cheated to play a role in criminal activities who do not even know what they were doing was against the law.
In conclusion, each case has its own story that should be considered before judging. Without gathering all the information, identifying the true culprit is out of question. Sometimes, some elements like the age of culprit, his mental status and the reasons of committing the crime, can alter the verdict completely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-16 | sinanarimani | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | panizzf | 67 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l on that. With this in mind, people in this situations are not as guilty as who int...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18613138686 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77081339941 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1521953757 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363313517483 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118039854916 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130166574175 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222247759616 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157798195736 0.056905535591 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.