Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when declining on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Through all these years, having strict and fixed punishments for each type of crime, has been a debating issue between individuals. While some people have wanted to exert certain ones for every criminal, others have desired to consider the stimulation for committing it in order to reduce on the punishment. I myself have concurred with humans whom have believed the offenders’ conditions have to be taken into account.
On the one side of this issue, having fixed and certain punishments for each type of crime have had several benefits for societies. Firstly, they have regarded as a deterrent for committing a crime. Actually, being aware of the consequences of doing an illegal task for criminals has been an effective obstacle for them not to do it. As a result, if someone decides to commit a crime, they will consider their retribution in the first place. Secondly, it has propelled societies to be safer. This is also because of their obstacle effect on people to commit a crime. For example, countries like japan which has had fixed punishments since 1970, their crime rate has reduced over the decades so they have more secure society than others. And finally, applying these kinds of punishments could be beneficial for governments, too. Obviously, allocating certain kind of retribution for each type of crime has led authorities to decide immediately after a crime being committed. In fact, they do not have to waste much amount of time to decide what would be a perfect punishment for criminals while spending a great deal of money to preserve them in custody. Consequently, devoting fixed punishments for various kinds of crime have affected on not only criminals’ opinion to commit a crime, but also court’s decision to choose the reasonable ones for them.
On the other hand, although having fixed punishments have had several advantages for societies, they have adverse drawbacks, too. Actually, applying predetermined retribution for all criminals could be mentioned as an unfair task. And that is because the circumstance of how the crime have been committed has been an essential factor to decide the intensity of their punishments. For instance, applying similar kind of retribution for both a serial killer who has killed several innocent people without having no certain reason and a person who has murdered someone in self-defense could not be impartial. However, both of them have killed some people, because of the difference on their conditions to commit their crime, the court should allocate various retribution for them.
In conclusion, albeit having these fixed punishments have had several benefits for not only society but also the governments, there are some human-beings who are against it. This group of individuals, which I have agreed with, has always been aware of how horrible situations would lead people to do an illegal thing. Because of that reason, difference between them should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-16 | sinanarimani | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | panizzf | 67 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful What is your opinion 73
- Topic The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 84
- linear process 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 479.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18371607516 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80566376536 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465553235908 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 779.4 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9454214475 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.863636364 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7727272727 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391774275331 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141133694907 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483229700277 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263308262291 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608690537628 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 479.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18371607516 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80566376536 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465553235908 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 779.4 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9454214475 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.863636364 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7727272727 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391774275331 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141133694907 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483229700277 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263308262291 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608690537628 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.