Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police force or military force, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs.
Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some people claim that women are more ill-suited than their male counterparts to the line of work in armed forces; however, the others and I opine that they should be treated as equals for some reasons. This essay will discuss both sides of the arguments and elaborate my personal standpoint.
On the one hand, advocates of gender discrimination in police and military forces may state the following rationales. To begin with, biological limitations in terms of physical strength and mental capacity are often mentioned as great discouragements to women. According to this justification, it is thought that they ought to be relegated to medical or clerical assignments rather than allowing them to hold positions in combat domains. Additionally, the act of further integrating women is believed to disrupt cohesion in the armed forces which are normally operated under masculine norms. As a consequence, cooperation or bonding might be strained since feminine needs and inputs have to be taken into account.
On the other hand, I contend that service women deserve equal treatments as men for a handful of reasons. For one thing, by incorporating women into every department, including management, they would have more authority to support fellow female members. It is often reported that women suffer from sexual assaults and other forms of harassment at the workplace with high frequency. Thus, if women are in positions of power in the field, they would be able to penalize evil acts as well as fighting and campaigning for their rights. The second reason is that they would serve as a paradigm for other enlisted women who would in turn be motivated to strive hard for job advancement and more superior delegation.
In conclusion, it is my firm belief that females should be treated equally as counterparts in the opposite gender within police and military areas despite the contrary argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-05 | hanhkatori2402 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | MingThui | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
- Topic To succeed in a business one needs to know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 80
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country s police force or military force while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs Discuss both views and give your opinion TRI HOMEWORK 05 06 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...d, I contend that service women deserve equal treatments as men for a handful of reas...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...m belief that females should be treated equally as counterparts in the opposite gender wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, for one thing, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17857142857 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86255943174 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3421658624 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.692307692 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250940541193 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830264506152 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517969840364 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139869902859 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399690839636 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.