Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both sides and give your opinion
It is considered by many that, reducing the excess packaging is being the responsibility of the manufacturers and supermarkets. However, it is argued by some that, if customers start to stop buying things with a lot of packaging then automatically supermarket starts to sell simple products. I would agree that, it is the responsibility of the producers to sell their products by avoiding excess package.
To begin with, it is believed by people that, excess packing is a market strategy to create false impression in the minds of customers regarding the product quality. So that, it is the responsibility of them to prove their superior quality products can be wrapped in a simple way. For example, many branded biscuits packets are accommodated only fifty percentage of total package. Even if they avoid extra package, they need not fear to lose their market because they already established in the market. In addition, customers often face difficulties to find their favourite products with simple packing since most of the products having excess packaging.
Moreover, this excess packaging certainly escalate the landfill and which is one of the major contributions for the pollution. Therefore, both manufacturers and supermarkets should be accepted the consequences of extra packaging and thus they should pack in simple way without compromising with product quality.
On the other hand, one of the ideal ways to stop extra packaging is done by customers who can refuse such items. But, this is not often possible, if we are not get the essential products in a simple wrapping. Despite consumers buying preference, supermarket would not ready to sell products with less package. Furthermore, people can not resist buying things since they greatly influenced by advertisements.
In conclusion, in my opinion, it is the responsibility of the producers and sellers to reduce the excess packaging to avoid possible side effects to the environment. Even though consumers can resist buying such items, it is not always done if we are really on demand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | quan quan | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | macydo | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Mr.Strange | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | Ania | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
- The bar diagram below shows the number of houses per year in 2 cities, Derby and Nottingham between 2000 and 2009. 73
- Table and notes below give information about student enrollments at Brighton Co ed Secondary school a privately run fee paying institute in 1990 2000 and 2010 85
- Some people say that economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stopped immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sidesand give your opinion. 73
- The internet is viewed as a excellent means of communication by many. However, there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uperior quality products can be wrapped in a simple way. For example, many branded biscuits pac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced by advertisements. In conclusion, in my opinion, it is the responsibility ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.273556231 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04642678882 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495440729483 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3449041937 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241514384993 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781652776397 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619969494616 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142545537271 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444118319174 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.