Some people say that animals can be used in any way for the benefit of humans. Others say that exploiting animals for human purposes is not acceptable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
To foster the prosperity of life, humans use animals to exploit it in all varied ways. While some people agree towards this statement, others argue this violates animals ethic and is unacceptable. This essay will break the two principles into clear discussion.
The various use of animals for people`s life is allowed because this does not provoke animal extinction. When using animals for clothing, live-stocking, and medical research, the companies farm and breed the animals, so there is a balanced-life-cycle in animals. The ever-increasing milk consumption that has been accepted since centuries ago can be a bold proof. While humans always use milk from dairy cows as a daily consumption, the number of that animal`s races do not drop due to manufactures excellent farming in that mammals` life. Despite this, some people treat the animals inappropiately.
The other side in animals exploitation that makes this action unacceptable is its cruelty violating animals ethic. Some companies or scientists using animals for their needs treat the animals as they are lower than human, including giving them a narrowed-dirty place to live, isolating them, and hurting their body. For instance, animal testing in many cosmetic companies injects many formulas to rabbits` body for testing ingridients, resulting in animals being disabled. This action is conducted like a mass presecution, and this is precisely inhuman, so this cruelty should be stopped. Therefore, animal should only be allowed to use if it is not harmful.
In conclusion, while some people believe that animals are allowed to use in any way for the sake of humans benefit, others argue this action should not be permitted. For this reason, It is suggested to use animals in a good way.
- Due to population growth many people these days live in apartments with limited space and no outdoor areas Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 84
- Pie graphs show nutritional consistency of two dinners 78
- Honey bee proccess 61
- Many people prefer to spend their money and not save it What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35231316726 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06541027643 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580071174377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9836513512 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386618790072 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150876888481 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867825315646 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273812490984 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774565176109 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.