Some people say that the best way to discourage smoking is to make smoking illegal in public places. Other people say that this is not enough and that other measures are needed. Discuss both these views, and give your opinion.
Many arguments seemed to be about how to dissuade people from smoking. While some people voice that prohibit smoking by issuing laws is the best way to deal with this problem, I side with those who believe it requires more solutions to maximize smoking cessation.
On the one hand, the official ban on smoking in public places is concerned a good way to help to increase community’s health. It is obvious that there are more no-smoking signs in places such as restaurants, shopping malls, office agencies, etc. It means this action is only allowed in private places where lead to smokers losing many chances using tobacco products. Thanks to that, it helps partly break people’s smoking habits. For example, more reports show the rate of people’s health is increasing because of public smoking prohibition. Hence, it is no doubt that this measure has a specific effect to reduce this bad habit somehow.
On the other hand, in contrast, I absolutely suppose that it is never enough when people are still allowed doing smoke action in the other places but public areas. Cigarette is still lit that affects the surroundings, especially smokers’ families who are directly been under influences from its poisons. For this reason, I tend to organize more propaganda sessions against smoking that clearly explains the disastrous consequences of tobacco on everyone’s health. For instance, many countries around the world such as China, New Zealand, India or Vietnam forbid any advertisements about tobacco traiding. Besides, anti-smoking programme through telivision, medias and other forms are concerned more seriously. After all, the rate of smokers in these countries are reducing gradually and will continue in the future.
In conclusion, smoking is needed more serious attentions from the whole community. Therefore, besides controlling public smoking, it should be combined with increasing people’s awareness about tobacco’s damage to health. I personally believe when those actions under taken, the risks can be controlled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-06 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | deolkuljeet1991 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-12 | hnhung | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | thevipershubham@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 56
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 56
- Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why Give reasons for your answer and use specific examples to support your answer 61
- Around the world children learn English as a second language at school However in some places they also learn at kindergarten pre school care when children are aged two to five Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of learning English at kindergarden 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, still, therefore, while, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39811912226 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76175370678 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614420062696 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1049672178 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.294117647 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287767630052 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871326586224 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689222503879 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170531185708 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469158558552 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.