Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is sometimes argued that people are paying attention to electronic devices to read books instead of using papers. While I agree with this trend, I do believe that people should keep the habit of reading traditional newspaper and magazines.
It cannot deny the fact that the appearance of technological advancement plays a vital role. One benefit is that it can store a lavish amount of books and it is user-friendly that people can take to them wherever and whenever they go. Therefore, not only saving money, it can also reduce the heavy lift. Another benefit is that E-books accelerate the flow of information when people need certain information, they can get it immediately, by downloading an ebook. Therefore, people can keep abreast of the information without going to go to bookstores to buy the newspaper.
However, the aforementioned facts can be seen as an opposite angle. Firstly, it may have errors since the article is reprinted as it is, without any editing or alterations and no payment is charged for the article. This leads to the quality of the news and may affect the writers. Secondly, e-books will directly damage the eyes because it is no doubt that any electronics is the cause of the eye problems.
In conclusion, e-books have both positive and detrimental effects on the activity of update the information.
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997 85
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 92
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region 81
- It is better to eat food which is produced locally by small farmers rather than food produced by factory farming and transported long distances To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87799311809 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2957642804 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153840036489 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495079079639 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593542831289 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888414062931 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705993840542 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.