Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier

Essay topics:

Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish. Others, however, argue that it has only made people busier.

Do you know that 80% of the people who work in the united states use computers in work? This essay is going to show two controversial opinions about using the modern technology in work. A side stand with involving the technology in work and the other is resistant to this idea.
On a hand, many people think that the developed technology is a big deal. Frequently, people who have repetitive jobs are always prefer using high technologies in their jobs. There are various reasons why those people outweigh involving technology in their work. First, It facilitate performing the routine and repetitive tasks. Second, it is highly recommended by the financial sector of any organisation to cut the costs. Third, the recommenders of this methodology believe that computers are more accurate and tend to be errorless. For instance, a company that try to be cost-effective may lay off some of its employees and their roles would be taken on by digital methods. Long calculations can be solved within few seconds however, an employee might take hours to do so.
On the other hand, great quantities of people have an obvious and sharp objection to interfere the technology with work. Furthermore, some employers and managers go to the side of those people as they prefer to play it safe and go behind the traditional ways of performing the work. Consequently, they have many beliefs and thoughts that are totally different in comparison to the first opinion. First of all, they have a high consideration to the computers’ efficiency. In other words, they have doubts that the computer may make mistakes as it happened before in many organisations. As well, some managers want to give more chances for the candidates to be hired rather than assigning a lot of roles to computers. Moreover, they have fears to waste a lot of time in teaching the employees how to use these technologies. They try to avoid misunderstanding of the employees of these technologies. For example, an accountant has misused the electronic accounting system that led to disturbance in the balance sheet.
In a nut meg, modern technology is spreading in the labor market, a lot of managers and employers are requiring the proficiency and need for the use of these technologies and follow this strong wave. On the contrary, various top-level management members are neglecting to join this wave. In my opinion you should be ready and fit both ways. If you have a lack of knowledge in using technology, develop yourself and be ready.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-07 tata 67 view
2022-09-07 tata 73 view
2022-09-07 tata 56 view
2022-09-07 tata 84 view
2022-09-07 tata 61 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...ple who have repetitive jobs are always prefer using high technologies in their jobs. ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'facilitates'?
Suggestion: facilitates
...ing technology in their work. First, It facilitate performing the routine and repetitive t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...disturbance in the balance sheet. In a nut meg, modern technology is spreading in ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, you know, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94774346793 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95728185879 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517814726841 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2583322225 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7916666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45833333333 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204114976989 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058423969071 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618154923224 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136817239093 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508402156358 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.