Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that attract too much attention and expenditure for money which is used to keep safe the wildlife inhabitants. While I agree that the human has paid too much attention and allocation too many resources to solve this issue, I believe that other factors are equally important.
On the hand, I agree that people need to protect a wealth of wildlife. Firstly, improving national parks which are the first real action. For example, in 2016, Vietnamese authorities paid out billions every year to plant, to take care kinds of animals and birds from north to south Vietnam such as Cuc Phuong, Ba Vi, and U Minh national parks. Secondly, the number of species on the verge of extinction like the Asia elephants, the Pumas. Hence, some nonprofit organizations and administrations with the best biologists around the world try to recovery ecosystem in order to create the place where breasts and fowls can easily live.
On the other hand, I believe that the governments waste utilizes societal resources. The first, there are a number of campaigns, TV programs and events which take up a lot of people’s time and money. For instance, Ho Chi Minh authorities proposed every committed, company and school had to hang posters about protecting the environment on June. The second, the number of videos about destroying the wildlife habitat is created by companies. It is cannot be denied that to build a video should expend not less a hundred million and if it appears on the media the administrations will spend lots of money on every minute.
In conclusion, while protecting the wildlife inhabitants is really essential, people do not spend too much attention and money on this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-02 | baonguyennhu | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-04 | dinelmao | 78 | view |
| 2017-12-25 | sherin rijo | 84 | view |
- Writing task 1: Internet users as percentage of population. 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
- The charts below give information about the people use the public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97887323944 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77521085302 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5852683501 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.769230769 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2367995284 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734966447501 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100153138172 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166167520296 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116259712463 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.