Some people say that travelling abroad is necessary to get knowledge about other countries, while others suggest that TV and the internet can also help people know about foreign countries. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the process of globalisation, many people reckon traveling abroad as an essential way to experience exotic life. However, some people argue that mass media such as television or the Internet is also an acceptable way to learn foreign cultures other than traveling. I will analyse both of their opinions in this essay and conclude my own viewpoints.
On the one hand, it is undoubtedly that traveling abroad is the direct and effective method to learn foreign cultures. To begin with, one could totally immerse himself into the original life by traveling to their destination. For example, by visiting the markets, they can learn local residents' eating preferences, living cost and daily life. These direct experiences cannot be replaced by any words or images from the Internet. Besides, some tourists can communicate with local people to understand their up-to-date ideas, which is beneficial to know more about these countries. Compared with that, information from mass media seems to be a bit outdated.
On the other hand, it is not easy for everyone to travel abroad due to a lot of reasons. Firstly, while the multinational transportation has developed rapidly and offered convenience in recent years, there are still a huge amount of people cannot afford a long-distance plane ticket. Taking China's figure as an instance, there are still approximately 1 billion people never been abroad until now. Furthermore, in these years, people are too busy to have sufficient vacation time to travel to other countries, which is more obvious in developing countries. For those people who want to know more about foreign countries, searching information about their ideal destinations from the Internet or watching documentaries from TV is a compensatory plan to satisfy their curiosities.
In conclusion, my idea is that traveling abroad is definitely an effective way to learn other countries, but it by no means the only way. Although the effect may be a bit discounted by learning from the media, it is still a practical way for those who cannot go abroad temporarily.
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In many countries, there are more people choose to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative development of society? 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 78
- Multi-cultural society, where people of different ethnic groups live together, can bring more benefits than drawbacks to country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with th 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... many people reckon traveling abroad as a essential way to experience exotic life...
^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...ect may be a bit discounted by learning form the media, it is still a practical way ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to form'
Suggestion: to form
...ect may be a bit discounted by learning form the media, it is still a practical way ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22023809524 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93919868142 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568452380952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6846947827 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304281073966 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917965772776 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676701477358 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179871956539 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706359277276 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.