Some people say that what children watch influences their behavior. Others believe the amount of time they spend on television influences their behavior most. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the advance of media industry, television now provides a variety of shows that are available for all ages, especially for the children viewers. Thus, there is an argument that whether the contents on the TV have more impacts or the time kids spend on watching television influences their behavior most. In my opinion, I believe the two views are both correct in some extents.
On the one hand, the contents on TV do have a big impact on kid’s behavior. In young ages, children do not have the ability to develop behavior by themselves. In fact, they imitate what they see on the TV screen. Therefore, the change of their behavior could be influenced by the quality of television shows. For example, when kids watch a good musical on TV, they adapt a new hobby to learn to sing because they want to imitate exactly what is appealing to them on the screen. In contrast, if kids are allowed to view violent TV shows, they could develop such aggressive behavior towards the others.
On the other hand, a large amount of time watching TV is also a big influence on children’s behavior. Firstly, kids could develop the habit of laziness by watching TV for a long time. A lot of parents complaint that their children do not want to stop after a long time sitting in front of the TV. Such habit influence kids to put aside other important tasks or assignments. Secondly, spending too much time on TV may directly damage the children’s eyesight which can lead to the change of other behavior. For instance, when kids cannot see objects clearly, they will try to glance closer by changing their sitting poses which could make their problems worse.
In conclusion, I believe it cannot be decided whether the television content or the amount of time watching TV is a more important factor because both are greatly impinging on the change of the kids’ behavior.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | Pham Quy Hien | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | thiendinh | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | newbie3107 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | newbie3107 | 73 | view |
- You have just spent a week with a friend on a holiday. When you got home, you realized you had left your wallet there.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter-Thank you friend for the holiday.-Explain that you left your wallet in their house.-Give th 73
- The local government is planning to change the bus timetable. You are not happy about the proposed changes.Write a letter to the newspaper. In the letter•describe the changes•explain how that will affect you•say how you would like the service to be 73
- Organized tours to remote areas and community are becoming more and more popular. Is this a positive or negative development for local people and the environment? 78
- You agreed to take a job over the summer but due to some unexpected problems you can no longer take the position Write a letter to the manager In your letter Apologize for not being able to take the job Explain your situation Say that you would be interes 77
- Today large shopping center and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77607361963 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64043442194 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496932515337 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2795292518 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379397210773 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136357490666 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797428200008 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24730782584 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529992010788 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.