Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The dynamics of education have changed dramatically around the world in the last few decades. Students should have the freedom to study as per their own choice according to one school of thought while others believe that it should be compulsory to follow a systematic structure of academic studies which holds the demand in near future. As far as I consider, students should be provided a range of subjects according to their interest which could help them to excel in their career.
First and foremost, specific skills are more important than theoretical studies nowadays. Employers require knowledge related to a particular job instead of random studies. That is how university students can identify a job of their interest and acquire a comprehensive knowledge of only that field of work. As a result, this practice will allow them to enhance their capabilities and expertise in their work. European countries, for instance, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden have an education system when they allow the students to choose any field of interest to study like art, science, and language at their earlier schooling and pursue till graduation instead of studying those subjects which they are not going to use in their professional life.
Conversely, some science subjects are dominant in the educational system worldwide. Most students feel the need for that knowledge at a certain point in their lives such as the usage of computer technologies, mechanical and medical-related items to get a better understanding of them. That is why it is better to have basic information about all the subjects as they are useful for daily life as well. Rather illustrative examples are multinational companies such as Samsung, Sony, Microsoft, and Apple that are inventing and innovating Hi-Tech products. These gadgets require basic knowledge of technology and students can learn such information in their academic life.
I am of the opinion that students should be provided subjects to study at universities which are crucial for their careers as other random knowledge can be obtained by other sources like magazines, newspapers and social media as well if required.
The conclusion to be drawn is that the job market is more narrow and specific to work these days and students show have the freedom to opt for subjects as per field requirements; however, other subjects are also important for daily lifestyle as they encompass knowledge of science and technology.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people feel that global warming should be dealt with by governments Others feel that it is the responsibility of individuals in society to solve the problem Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- A healthy person is often described as someone who has a good diet gets lots of exercise and avoid stress What do people do to stay healthy in your country 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...they are useful for daily life as well. Rather illustrative examples are multinational...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24050632911 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85426169195 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516455696203 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9090038036 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315439640923 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963676405276 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702293070868 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178681912501 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393861731741 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...they are useful for daily life as well. Rather illustrative examples are multinational...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24050632911 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85426169195 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516455696203 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9090038036 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315439640923 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963676405276 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702293070868 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178681912501 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393861731741 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.