Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a

Essay topics:

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In recent decades, people around the world have two distinguish views causing some public controversy about the choice of how many subjects students should make in university. Although some might suggest that students should be forced to study some certain subjects, I completely agree with those who believe that it would be better when they can choose to study whatever they want.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why people argue that universities should only allow students to pursue practical subjects. First, from the personal point of views, the stem subjects such as medicine, engineering, and technology are able to provide much more job opportunities, chances of promotion and a higher salary than others. As a result, citizens have more sources to improve the quality of their life. Second, in the economics’ perspective, the government can take control of output human resources and narrow the gap of cognition and experience among nations. Moreover, by being geared the challenging knowledge from these useful subjects, students can play an important role in boosting grow economics and international integration.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that students should be given free hand to choose the course they want to access. It can be seen that passion would be the key factor help students to facilitate society. In fact, suitable subjects would encourage students to research and dig for more information than compulsory disciplines. In addition, people are unable to predict which exact fields will be the most popular and really useful in the future. Consequently, some mental states relating the art areas like creative thinking, history, and philosophy might be overestimated above the technical skills.

In conclusion, it is clear that only allowing certain key disciplines in universities can benefit either students or the whole country’s economy. However, it seems better to support the idea that students have their own right to pursue what subjects they want.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 zixuan 89 view
2020-01-16 shihan99 67 view
2020-01-10 thyarthy 84 view
2020-01-06 Techna 67 view
2019-12-14 lexuanthai93 73 view
Essays by user Pham Thi Nhung :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39432176656 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81732612126 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624605678233 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3092278541 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401803263906 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113532131688 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888618671231 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224017785346 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996000996939 0.056905535591 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.