Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion
The question of whether or not people should exclude art from school syllabus has generated controversy among general public. While some people consider art an indispensable subject, others argue that learning art appears futile for learners. Both arguments will be analyzed before I put forward reasons why I agree with the later view.
On the one hand, advocates champion the idea that art should play a part of teaching module for learners, especially, at young age. Experts have proved that art can contribute to children’s cognitive development by stimulating their creativity and observation. Although there are those who argue that art fails to profit children’s future career, it is possible that learning art helps explore learners’ inborn aptitude which can bring about great career opportunity in their future. A case in point is film industry, in which artists can generate a huge amount of fame and wealth with their talents.
On the other hand, many hold the view that learning art is fruitless; therefore, it should be removed from the teaching curriculum. Art can be a burdensome for those who do not own any vocation for art and exert some negative impact on children’s performance in other subjects. What is more, art also fails to convey any value in the digital world of work in the future where key subjects such as math and science are crucial. Despite the fact that people believe art can bring merit to children’s intellectual development, parents can register an art course for their children to pursue in case they have some innate abilities.
Taking everything into consideration, I am inclined to believe that educators should take into more consideration when it comes to excluding art from school program. Personally, I support the view that art does not play crucial role in children’s academic success. In the foreseeable future, art can be an elective subject and no longer a nightmare for those without an aptitude.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-24 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
2022-10-06 | Albert Armin | 73 | view |
2022-09-19 | hari haran | 56 | view |
2022-09-19 | hari haran | 56 | view |
2022-01-18 | nguyenthikimsang | 78 | view |
- Nowadays animal habitats are increasingly under threat from mining projects Some believe that stopping these projects to protect species is more important than proceeding whilst others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for 84
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Technological innovations in this 21st century have caused more harm than good Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether or not people should exclude art from s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...yllabus has generated controversy among general public. While some people consider art an indi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...ith their talents. On the other hand, many hold the view that learning art is fruitless...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, while, such as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.146875 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81305376493 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603125 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0663362742 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271313040874 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100403907474 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697030655546 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181902056404 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636391427296 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.