Some people think that employers should give its taff at least four weels holidays a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the growing fierce competition and the rapid pace of daily life, people in today's society are suffering from heavy physical and psychological pressure without sufficient leisure. Therefore, some business owners believe that they could tackle this problem by extending the worker's holiday to at least 4 months a year. I consider that the demerits of this suggestion outshine the merits of it.
Admittedly, prolonging holidays does have some advantages. To begin with, long-time holidays enable employees to other necessary things, namely managing health conditions, accompanying family members, and developing interests. Practically, in some big corporations, employers are willing to give their staff extra time to stay with family, but in return, they have to enhance their working efficiency and productivity. Another obvious advantage of extending holidays is that workers could have a sense of belonging to the company. As a result, it is not only a way for corporations to keep their professional and talented staff, but also make staff devote all of their energy to work thanks to their sufficient rest.
However, the policy of extending employees' holidays will also lead to some disadvantages. First of all, permitting more lasting holidays would create a more onerous burden on the company's finances. With fewer employees, companies have to reduce the number of projects and tasks, which might lead to lower efficiency and productivity. In fact, it can be proved that rarely companies could carry out policies of more than 15 days off but still remain salary. Besides, an extended holiday might harm the staff's behaviors and enthusiasm. The more prolonged the holiday is, the harder obstacles workers ought to deal with when they come back to their workplace. Therefore, Companies are expected to consider thoroughly about holiday policy because it might easily break employee's patterns and habits of current jobs.
To sum up, I would argue a suitable holiday time of one or two weeks is a good choice. It boosts the staff's enthusiasm and reinforces a strong relationship among workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-30 | munmun0905 | 89 | view |
- More and more companies are allowing employee to work at home Do you think it is a positive or negative problem 61
- Most of the world problem are caused by over population To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution ans uses up the world s fuel resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government Some think it would be a good idea for younger people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In many part of the world children and teenagers are commiting more crimes What are the causes How should the young criminals to be punish 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'staffs'' or 'staff's'?
Suggestion: staffs'; staff's
...o weeks is a good choice. It boosts the staffs enthusiasm and reinforces a strong rela...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, at least, in fact, as a result, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34036144578 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82725129864 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.059413446 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.294117647 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168364897209 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500885896271 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424685988339 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909174737124 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469795268249 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.