Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
It has been argued that besides providing higher education, the government should assure its free approach for all individuals without caring about their financial status. Personally, when not disavowing that all citizens deserve to have opportunities to attend college, I think the idea of free tertiary education for them should be eschewed.
To begin with, there has been a consensus that education is recognized as a fundamental human right. Thus, since higher education imparts in the training system, providing its nationwide access is an obligation, not merely an action that governments should do. In addition, stepping into the 21st century, building up an egalitarian society becomes a priority for states; hence ensuring equal chances to acquire tertiary degrees can be seen as an imperative mission, especially when residents are equal in intelligence and scholastic capability.
However, free higher education for all financial classes is an unsuitable policy. Regarding to the budget problems, assisting students with their tuition fees will upsurge the government’s expenditure. This challenge, which majority of the population has ability to face, may become an unnecessary financial burden on the authority, pushing it to the verge of bankruptcy or detrimental fiscal policy, such as higher taxes. On the other hand, the significant rise in number of students also exerts a greater pressure on universities’ infrastructure and human resources, making it less likely to keep pace with the increasing dimension of training activities. Consequently, there are question marks over the training quality, as well as the interaction between lecturers and learners.
In brief I believe that although equal chances to attend universities should be ubiquitous, it is unwise for the government to provide free higher education for everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-13 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 76
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages? 89
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend is a positive or negative development 93
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, i think, in addition, in brief, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69534050179 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15993680336 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2835757878 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.454545455 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0909090909 7.06120827912 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208635372533 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787860860142 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484312815107 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130675346232 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047799768612 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.