Some people argue that hazard sports activities should be restricted by governments. Meanwhile, others believe that opting for different sports are needed to be based on an individual's choices with freedom. This essay will discuss both opinions and reveal personal ideas.
On the one hand, opponents who are against doing extreme sports point out that the biggest problem of this training is that many athletes and amateurs can be easily exposed to be hurt and get injuries while doing practices. For example, many young climbers who generally climb the highest skyscraper buildings in the world enjoy their sports. However, many of them might get serious wounds such as bleed or bruise, and in the worst scenario, they are killed in a fall. On top of that, many young people are likely to imitate such sports games, which look appealing and exciting without the precautions or guidance of the games, so they would also get unexpected disorders. As a result, this can be a big social issue ultimately.
On the other hand, choosing what people want to do should rely on an individual's free will as long as it does not harm other people. This is because everyone has a fundamental right to enjoy their lifestyle with the state of happiness. Many athletes say that they could feel satisfaction by challenging the human's limitation with their passion while doing extreme sporting. Besides, the sense of fulfilment can trigger the participants to live their lives more positively and energetically when they achieve their goals in sports. Aside from that, all kinds of exercises or sportings have a risk potentially as physical movements in human are always required to complete a race or contest. Thus, taking a risk is a natural element of doing sports games.
In conclusion, there are pros and cons of having sports activities which are hazards. However, I personally, think that it seems to be better when everyone is allowed to select any sports games they like regardless of the level of danger due to some distinctive benefits, which make them feel happy and delighted.
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Other say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which view point do you agree with? 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restuarnts between 2003 and 2013. 78
- In some countries governments pay the money for students' university fees, while in other countries students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages? 61
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a Positive or negative development?Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...g what people want to do should rely on an individuals free will as long as it does not harm o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ld feel satisfaction by challenging the humans limitation with their passion while doi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 755, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... natural element of doing sports games. In conclusion, there are pros and cons o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03179190751 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62097937697 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592485549133 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7372244601 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229810391142 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670977427559 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578143847988 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139638721773 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539873924258 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.