Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are different views about how governments should allocate public money. Some people believe that taxes should be spent on medical treatment. However, I would argue that it is better if governments focus on promoting healthy lifestyle.
Firstly, by raising people awareness about healthy lifestyle, governments can prevent health problems effectively. Today, many common diseases like obesity, heart disease are results of an unhealthy lifestyle. These illnesses could be easily prevented by having a healthy diet and regular exercise. For example, the British Government recommends eating five portions of fruit and vegetables per day, this result in a decrease in the rate of people with diabetes.
Secondly, spending money on promoting healthy lifestyle could save a lot of money and effort. In contrast to healthcare services, running campaigns to raise people awareness is much cheaper and more effectively. For example, an activity name Running Day in my country which takes place in 2/4 annually is a great and efficient way to educate people about the importance of daily exercising.
Lastly, spending money on treatment for patients is a waste of money. Some diseases such as cancer or asthma that cannot be cured, which is just a waste of time and resources if governments allocate taxes to those. Some people might argue that by spending money on health care, governments help poor people have the chance to approach medical treatment. This might be true to some extent, however, I would argue that public money should be used in favor of the whole society p, not a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, I reaffirm my opinion that taxes should be spent on promoting healthy lifestyle rather than providing medical treatment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-06 | Minh Duc Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | ndiep | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | cuong.ielts | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | cuong.ielts | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 79
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking? 78
- In some cities of the world cars are replacing bicycles However in some other cities bicycles are replacing cars What are the reasons for these two developments In your opinion which one is better 72
Comments
Each challenge is an…
Each challenge is an opportunity in disguise. With our take my proctor exam for me service, unlock the doors to your potential. Our dedicated team sees the genius within you, waiting to shine. Embrace this chance to transform, to soar, and to redefine your academic journey.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30465949821 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71853816655 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3689782604 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312851280408 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105396487788 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651571797544 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164645492087 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398427449061 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.