some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Some people think that libraries are better than e-libraries and like the old-fashioned way of reading, whilst others think that this is not a cost-effective way and should be replaced, which seems to be a logical argue.
Firstly, some readers naively suggest that libraries have been the major source of books for many years, and people are used to go to libraries to study, being a quiet place and easier to concentrate. Secondly, they think that provided one wants to access to a vast number of books, he can enroll in a library and have a hand on many books easily. This, however, appears to be not true. Hardly can a library has all the books that, for example, a college student needs. Finally, they argue that it is cheaper to rent a book rather than buying it. All these points can be achieved by using computer in a straightforward and cost-effective way which is computer-based tools.
Some people, on the other hand, claim that with purchasing an e-book reader like Kindle, produced by amazon, it can bring about all the needs of a reader. Using paper books can cause damage to our environment, in that publishing a book requires logging and needs lots of water. E-book readers, however, can solve these problems with replacing it with digital books that do not need papers. Firstly, some might argue that it is not suitable for our eyes and we may loose our eyesight. Thanks to new technologies, e-book readers can simulate papers and do not harm our eyes at all. Secondly, they may suggest that e-book readers are very expensive and are not costly efficient. To answer this issue, many online libraries provide a monthly subscription for books that in the long run would be more budget-friendly for us to use them.
Although some people prefer paper books, it is much better for ourselves and our environment to use computers instead. Not only can they be more healthier, but also they are cheaper. So it would be in all our interest to use computers rather than paper books.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | mohamadre3a | 73 | view |
- Nowadays consumer goods have become the most important part of people’s lives.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The first smartphone was invented in 1992. By the year 2023 there may be as many as 2.5billions smartphones in the world. The use of smartphones is decreasing our intelligencebecause we are reliant on the technology and not our own minds. To what extent d 84
- Some people are fond of buying new gadgets, phones, or laptops. Is this a good or bad thing? Discuss your opinion. 78
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should take responsibility for it.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character fromtheir choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 465, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...is not suitable for our eyes and we may loose our eyesight. Thanks to new technologie...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...computers instead. Not only can they be more healthier, but also they are cheaper. So it would...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77521613833 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64054013894 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518731988473 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3633162471 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151759714789 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520669213118 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439005735696 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109895878496 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363300660651 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.