Some people think news has no connection to people's lives, so it is a waste of time to read the news in newspapers and watch television news programs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued whether news is useful for individuals' lives or not. Although there are some who opine that they are disconnected from people's lifestyle, I totally disagree with this statement for the reasons explained below.
Firstly, news provide knowledge in various issues, and this is a main reason why they are not time-consuming. More specifically, the phenomenon of watching news via Television or reading them in newspapers will support you in forming comprehensive viewpoints in everyday matters. Not only can you have your own opinion when judging any occasions, but also you can discuss more topics with friends in daily talks. For example, reading news like politics, economy or environment makes you aware of these issues and capable of starting a conversation related to them. If you are specialized in medicine or science, medical or scientific news will intensify your knowledge accumulation.
Secondly, shaping a personal habit of reading news will bring massive societal advantages. If the majority of citizens read about the latest news in local newspapers or watch what is going on globally, they will be more sensitized of the issues that affect their society both directly and indirectly. In this case, the community will be necessarily benefit from these kinds of people. To illustrate this, people are usually reading a plethora of topics in newspapers, so as to avoid becoming decadent individuals. But more fundamentally, newspapers and Television often break the news in categories, giving the choice to their readers or auditors to learn about the things that are more concerned. As a result, people choose to be informed the way they want to, and news are embedded in their lives in a manner that individuals are willing to.
In conclusion, despite the counterarguments of the utility of getting informed via Television or newspapers, I am of the view of the importance of the latter both for personal and social benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-22 | Shivam Singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | longpm2k | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-23 | Sprios_D | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | katenokk84 | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-09 | Jiny Ju | 73 | view |
- Children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies in school What are the reasons How can we solve this problem 84
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 78
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children them to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 78
- Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom Do you agree with this statement What is an alternative to traditional face to face teaching 78
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ing a plethora of topics in newspapers, so as to avoid becoming decadent individuals. Bu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21904761905 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9849813029 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574603174603 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4116344689 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325606961229 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107234753324 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053251370833 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163974185803 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874319123895 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.