Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Development and implementation of technologies have become a distinctive question of current century. Certain people rather choose receiving world’s updates using newspaper than any different press, while others completely disagree. Considering a position that reading paper sources is more productive, in my opinion advanced technologies propose more comfortable variants.
On the one hand, for better assimilation of information paper media is necessary. That is so due to several psychological features that improve understanding what was read such as tactile sense of material and connection between paper and knowledge in our brain. In this context learning news from newspapers contributes deep drive into topic and starts the memorising process. For example, according to MSU student council analysis about 75% students using books in exam preparation have total marks 4 and 5 only. Thus, paper sources could be useful for realising new information.
On the other hand, modern sources of informing are more convenient than printed media. It means that nowadays people prefer an opportunity to perceive visual information through their gadgets to paper texts. As a consequence, hardly can a person enjoy going outside and spending money on newspapers while they have a comfortable way of receiving information by internet. For instance, Moscow Statics Service reports that demand for newspapers dropped by 10% since 2020. Therefore television and news sites should be considered as more comfortable technological alternative of paper media.
Despite the idea of effectiveness of newspapers’ review, I am of the opinion that nowadays easier research news in Internet or watch TV.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | ashkan zaheri | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | CDTSON | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of different types of fast food in Australia among teenagers between 1975 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 11
- Some feel governments rather than private companies should be in charge of medical services To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should writ 61
- People nowadays sleep less than they did in the past Why is this Do you think it is a negative or positive development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to receive'.
Suggestion: to receive
...t century. Certain people rather choose receiving world’s updates using newspaper than an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 471, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r newspapers dropped by 10% since 2020. Therefore television and news sites should be con...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71936758893 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08921539071 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695652173913 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4272300174 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171100134514 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529590792612 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359633300893 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951035409568 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246775622411 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.