Some people think that parents have a powerful influence in child’s life, while the influence from outside the home plays a bigger part of child’s development. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, several people believe that the children’s faculty is determined by their social interaction even though parents have a big impact for their improvement. Partially, I consent to the same point of view for several reasons which I will elaborated in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, perhaps, the influence of children relative especially their parents play a big role in children life as parents are the first teacher since they have been born. Regarding the children habit, parents could sharpen children either providing supplement like scientific book that support their interest or just neglect the children potential. Subsequently, the specific habit could be generated and sharpen the child’s development. Furthermore, the parents’ facility including nutrition (Omega 3) could be essential for them especially in the old-age (3-5 years old). It determines children development in terms of how the way they comprehend particular subjects. If children lack of such nutrition, their intelligence would be in the low rate.
On the flip side, in my point of view, the social environment probably engages children to find their identity since they could figure out a friend that have the same interest and become success. To illustrate, Noah band, one of the most famous bands in Indonesia, met with all members in junior high school bringing them to create band and become successful. In addition, the more advanced facilities from school are provided, the higher odds children ability could be defined. For example, children who interest in music, they would be provided such facilities including circumstances (friend and teacher) where could improve their ability and confident intensively.
To sum up, it seems to me that it is essential for children development to get along outside home since bring several merits including increasing children faculty with resembling with others and defining and sharpening the children ability earlier. This is as long as parents provide appropriate nutrition for supporting their natural ability.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-27 | Andi Irwan Nur | 84 | view |
2022-12-27 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 70
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you thing the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 61
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'elaborate'
Suggestion: elaborate
...f view for several reasons which I will elaborated in the following paragraph. On the one...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48113207547 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84563395564 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5502419574 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089491369309 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341762747705 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038924927523 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055865413168 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300763940676 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'elaborate'
Suggestion: elaborate
...f view for several reasons which I will elaborated in the following paragraph. On the one...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48113207547 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84563395564 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5502419574 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089491369309 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341762747705 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038924927523 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055865413168 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300763940676 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.