Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while others think that television is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today’s world, most countries have shown great concern about the news. When this issue comes into view, there exist many conflicting opinions. Some people strongly agree that the best way to gain news is using radio. Meanwhile, others share the view that television is better for this purpose. Both of the views have their own merits which require careful consideration.
On the one hand, some people are of the view that radio is the most suitable way to gain news. One explanation to support this view is that radios are very commonly used, which allows people to get news when travelling. This is because radios are installed in almost all cars and public transportation, which can help people also update news when moving. This is shown by the following example. According to the result of a Media Post newly-researched survey, an average 9 in 10 commuters listen to traditional AM or FM radio when they are in their car or on their way to work. As a result, radio is more beneficial than television for them.
On the other hand, some people argue that television is more appropriate than radio. The most frequent factor contributing to this view is that the channels on television are obviously divided, into fixed themes. Therefore, it is easy for people using this technology to search for the news needed. For example, in Vietnam, ANTV channel gives that news related to the security, while VTV3 channel is about entertainment and the show of celebrities or VTV7 presents the issues regarding education and so on. As this illustration has shown, it is clear that channels on TV are separated in a specific way, while channels on radio are not. For this reason, television is a better choice than radio.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that both radio and television bring their particular positive impacts on the way to update news, which cannot be denied. However, from my point of view, I am convinced that TV is a better method than radio.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | riyapatel30 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | riyapatel30 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | lhm.ils | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-25 | lhm.ils | 73 | view |
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 89
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop To what extent do you agree 56
- Compare the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps show the art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people believe that in order to have clean and tidy streets in their neighbourhood this should be the residents responsibility while others think it should be the government s duty What is your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 586, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific way" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...clear that channels on TV are separated in a specific way, while channels on radio are not. For t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85545722714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68324395503 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525073746313 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5615761842 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6315789474 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402927164155 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135302789736 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718011101907 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250963597046 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578552573199 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.