Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
In recent decades, traffic problems have been receiving a great deal of public attention due to their substantial impact on human life. Although some argue that using severe punishment can prevent traffic accidents, I agree with those who believe that there are several others which would be benefits for transportation.
There are a number of reasons why strict punishments are supposed as the key to diminishing traffic accidents. First, these can act as a deterrent and influence the behaviors for driving offenses. In fact, in order to avoid being punished commuters have to control their private vehicles carefully and obey the regulations. Second, by imposing the severe fine on traffic offenses, the government can raise money to invest in transport infrastructure. For instance, people who are likely to break the traffic laws such as driving while intoxicated or exceeding the speed limit often made to pay financial penalties.
However, it is undeniable that other road safety measures also play an integral part to protect human life. First, educating adolescents about the traffic law at a young age, especially before getting driving licenses, can lessen the pressure on traffic. As consequences, they will become law-abiding citizens who obviously understand the danger of traffic infringement. In addition, other effective methods like installing speed cameras, appointing traffic warden also ensure that vehicles only adhere to the right way. Finally, in order to calm the traffic, local authorities can upgrade and expand public transport provision.
In conclusion, not only strict punishments but other measures also can be considered as the important tools to control the increasing rate of traffic accidents. Hence, the government should balance and use them in an effective way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | wardiati | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | mohammad.iraf | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | do tuan tu | 56 | view |
- The charts show what the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 78
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... government should balance and use them in an effective way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4928057554 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87455988985 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647482014388 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2244157284 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.071428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250161629866 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816498176297 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580802304216 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15412062812 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019456539534 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.