Some people think that students in high or secondary school can choose courses freely, others think that courses such as mathematics must be compulsory.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Freedom of course selection among students remains debatable. While some suggest that high or secondary school students should select classes suiting their needs, others maintain that fundamental subjects like mathematics are mandatory. This essay aims to discuss both stances before concluding.
Supporters of early individualism in education highlight its facilitation towards personal orientation. Aligning school subjects with individual interests can satiate and bolster learners’ passion, consequently increasing their commitment to education. This philosophy is applied in some international schools, where a small number of students can opt for courses in Business, Music, or Coding instead of common subjects such as English and Mathematics. In addition to invaluable insights, independent scheduling also fortifies crucial work-related skills such as time management and task prioritizing. As a result, an early guided focus can give young learners a competitive edge when competing for a job or running their own business in their field of interest.
Still, there are convincing arguments in favor of maintaining lessons in crucial subjects. The cardinal benefit is that students need to acquire valuable foundational skills to function normally as a citizen. This notion is illustrated by the presence of mathematics in all educational levels, as without the subject, students would not be able to compute and derive logical deductions. Likewise, the absence of History and Science could render growing adolescents unrelatable to their culture and perplexed by common phenomena. Fundamental subjects provide learners with universally applicable skills and knowledge even when they lack a specific professional desire. Although their future jobs do not necessarily require all techniques learned in school, educated individuals can still benefit from applying them in other aspects of life.
Having examined both standpoints, I believe it is better to make crucial subjects compulsory. This approach seems more feasible as well since the majority of schools have limited resources and qualified personnel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-16 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- Light pollution excessive light during night time is a form of pollution that distresses many people especially in modern cities What are the causes of light pollution and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take 84
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 84
- The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days Do you agree with this statement 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ed in some international schools, where a small number of students can opt for courses in Busines...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ited resources and qualified personnel.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, likewise, second, so, still, well, while, in addition, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96078431373 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04100024914 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696078431373 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6532594019 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186504188937 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524175838428 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491080167569 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11127908235 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689747788133 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.