some people think that subjects tough in school are a waste of time, while others disagree and believe that this type of education is useful for students. discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Education sets the distinct way of sucess.presently, some proportion of masses assert that there is no need of tough subjects in school education. By Contrast, others think that study of difficult subject is mandatory in school. Here, I would like to account both the view points.
There are manifold points to support the former view. First and foremost, children can face extra burden by learning tough subjects. For example, they can not understand tough subjects such as mathematics, science and many more and parents hire tuition tutor for them where they get extra work for studying. Therefore, they can not only complete school work but also pay attention on tuition work. Apart from it, difficult subjects diminish the interest of students in other subject as they bind themselves all the time with difficult subject. As a result, they waste plethora of time on those subjects that are difficult rather than give time interested subjects. On the other side, opposite wind is also there.
To begin with, initially, difficult subjects is fruitful for students future.To illustrate, students can become eminent doctors and engineer's by studying tough subject. Moreover, in this competitive world we have seen that almost all governments test such as tet, net, bank test and many others are very hard to crack becouse all the tests set in a high level. So if students wants to crack any government test they must study difficult subjects in schools.
To recapitulate, Undeniably, tough subjects are difficult to understand. However, still I believe that it is beneficial to change the way of learning tough subjects rather than imposing it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-09 | mickaelaelaine | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | Mikul Patel | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Kudrat | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | Architecture | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | mostafa jahangiri | 84 | view |
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 75
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 76
- Nowadays people try to balance their life and work with other things in life, but actually some could achieve it so far, what are the reasons for this. how can be solve this problem. 56
- Some people believe that childrens leisure activities must be educational. otherwise they are complete waste of time. do you agree or disagree with the statement. give reason of your answer and include example from experience. 56
- At the present time, the population of some countries include a large number of young people, compared with number of old people. Do the advantage of this situation outweigh the disadvantages. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an not understand tough subjects such as mathematics, science and many more and p...
^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ubjects is fruitful for students future.To illustrate, students can become eminent...
^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ouse all the tests set in a high level. So if students wants to crack any government ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, apart from, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19475655431 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68997827333 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7673342996 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241519756905 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838188758946 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455377331392 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152456906526 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578638715967 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.