Some says that most important thing about being rich is that one has opportunity to help others. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
Its controversial and rather debatable topic that whether having money pursuit people for charitable work or not. Some people believe that best thing about being affluent has many chances to support underprivileged section of society.In this essay we will discuss the advantages of having money which translate into myriads of opportunities. I agree this statement completely and put forward my opinion in its favor.
The income or money is basic necessity of life and people who have richer resources have many advantages over other. Because if you did not fulfill your on needs, then you would not have chance to assist others. Many well off people running social organization about research, poverty and education around the world. For example Bill Gates Foundation sponsoring research on deadly diseases in Africa and Asia. And lessening the threats of resistant diseases spreading the Earth which effecting 50 million people each years. Although, if he did not have resources, he would unable to endowed for global health cause.
However, some people thing that if a person have willingness and motivation to do anything, he will defiantly convince the world. But I personally disagree with this point; because conceiving something huge required relative proportion of resources in its hindrance. Many people start with passion and enthusiasm; but eventually stop, because of intensive obstacles. To deal with required a lot of endorsement and power which only be achieve by resources, they do not have.
In this essay we discussed the many benefits we gain personally and on community level with having money; without money emotional persuade weakened. I strongly argue the noble causes for which many richer people are working, defiantly have positive impact on posterity.
- the graph below shows the four countries of residence of overseas students in austria 73
- the graph below shows the quantities trasported in the uk between 1974 and 2002 by different mode of transport.sumerised the main information and by selecting main features where comparasion possible. 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity generated in hydroelectric power station? Summaries the main information by reporting the main features and make comparison where possible. 73
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- the chart below shows the number of girls education out of 100 boys in developing and developed countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople believe that best thing about being affluent has many chances to support und...
^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...port underprivileged section of society.In this essay we will discuss the advantag...
^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun well seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many wells'.
Suggestion: Many wells
...would not have chance to assist others. Many well off people running social organization ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gree with this point; because conceiving something huge required relative proport...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople start with passion and enthusiasm; but eventually stop, because of intensiv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36785714286 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72252274592 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7556550155 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0827461332338 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297540254104 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408592359211 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516953300429 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326563744244 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.