Some students take a year off between school and university, to work or to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, many high school leavers choose to start their work and take a trip before going to university. Although a gap year is not without advantages, its drawback will be far more significant.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons why the young take a year off before pursuing higher education. First, many adolescents are undecided about their future, either in major choice or career path, a gap year enables them to have some more time to ascertain the right long-term decision. Moreover, this activity helps students to enrich themselves of real-life experience which is advantageous for their future jobs, as a result, they can learn a wealth of working skills such as problem-solving skill, communication and time management while some recruiters often seek. Second, travelling to different places after finishing high school, young people can lead to an improvement in student's social and cultural knowledge. Not only are such experiences conducive to the youth's mature, but these youngsters can also to be straightforward to integrate in the globalised world.
On the other hand, there are many disadvantages for students who spend a gap year. First, while taking a gap year can be a refreshing break for non-stop academic pursuit, many students find it difficult to get back into the schedule and regain the studying momentum. For example, one might be more reliant on earning money to satisfy his thirst for purchase stuff such as cars and technological devices, thus he will be willing to end the path of tertiary education for that reason. Meanwhile, going to university can help the young earn high-salary jobs and good position later as competitive professions, like designers and doctors, always require academic understanding. Second, travelling a gap year can be an expensive endeavour to many young adults, especially students from families with meagre incomes since it costs them a lot, ranging from transport to food and accommodation during that time. Besides, travelling for a gap year can fascinate students in discovering which makes them distract from learning and is a culprit to a decrease of the academic results of students after enrolling university.
In conclusion, the demerits of spending a gap year before following university program are too overwhelming compared to its upsides. Young people should consider their expectation to make the best decision.
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- Some students take a year off between school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 89
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage c 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...igh-salary jobs and good position later as competitive professions, like designers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28385416667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94057237193 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591145833333 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6295337029 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.266666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223770090092 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074284691481 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508770407127 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125594939016 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513939335682 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.