Some think that cars are best way to travel in a city, others think bicycle is better. Discuss both points of views and give your opinion?
In 21st century where life has been updated. Some of the people deem that traveling in cars are better in the town while the opponents believe that bicycle is the best. In this essay I will discuss both the sides.
It’s true that cars are the easiest way to reach the destination. It does not consume much of our time. Furthermore, it protects us safe from the pollution and gases of cars. Though, it also covers us from the sun in hot months where sweat can come easily as well as from the rain in chilly weather. For instance, as it said that first impression is the last impression if, a CEO has a meeting with international organization and, he is wet of rain water or he have the smell of sweat so, he will not be able create a good impression with such gesture. As well as, it keeps us safe from harsh injuries of accidents. Additionally, it can take more than four members at time also it can also carries a huge load with an ease.
Bicycle have a lot of benefits, firstly, being living in a city means a lot of traffic on roads so, with the help of bicycle we can coupe the heavy traffic. It can be passed and ridded in that plethora of cars because it is not much big as cars. Secondly, it contributes to the environment, doesn’t not pollute the city atmosphere with gases. Thirdly, it is cheap than other source of transportation and it does not capture big areas of the city.
In conclusion, I viewed both the opinions of travelling by bicycle and cars but bicycles are better than care. I feel that, the people of city must be encouraged to ride bicycles which will even help them in their physical exercise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-14 | faisal vhora | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | MAHIR VHORA | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-11 | Niizam | 56 | view |
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The table gives information about the underground railway system in 6 countries 78
- The diagram below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future 67
- some people say that modern innovations have more harm than good Do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...st century where life has been updated. Some of the people deem that traveling in cars are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...tion and, he is wet of rain water or he have the smell of sweat so, he will not be a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 690, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'carry'
Suggestion: carry
...n four members at time also it can also carries a huge load with an ease. Bicycle have...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: CONTRACTED_FORM_NOT[1]
Message: You used a negation after a negated contracted verb. Did you mean simply 'doesn’t'?
Suggestion: doesn’t
...dly, it contributes to the environment, doesn’t not pollute the city atmosphere with gases....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39735099338 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49931353235 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559602649007 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0904528753 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191321378851 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651925237578 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964666068334 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145659062564 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947110152126 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 12.4159519038 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.