Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Recently, many college students interest to learn more about their side studies. While some argue that this is a negative choice, I believe that there is no justification for this.
Regarding to this case, skills are needed nowdays, not just about their major, but multidiscipline knowledge is too important. Firstly, when a pharmacist works in a drugstore, they are not just able to read and serve the drug in prescriptions asked for by customers, but they are also able to communicate with them, in case giving them an explanation of how to use the drug and maybe responding to feedback and suggestions from customers. Secondly, those who want to be a leader should combine their professional background with their experiences in the whole intersection of different majors, because that skill is available to make the best strategies to facing the challenges in the world, besides could give the effective solution to clear the problem that happens in their company.
Nevertheless, I would argue the negative impact if a student only learns their major subject. One of the biggest problems is unemployment, and one of the major contributors to this is their idealism. Scholars didn’t want to join the company if they could recruit someone similar to their background. In the other hand, many companies fire their staff because they disable adapt to the situation in that company. The unemployment may therefore worsen if this trend continues.
Overall, although there are advantages to studying other objects, there are drawbacks too serious. Regulations should be implemented in order to add their skills for facing their better future.
- Coffe and tea buying and drinking habits in five cities in Australia 73
- Number of US households in millions by annual income 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 11
- There have been major advances in technology over recent decades and this has led to significant improvements in people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28301886792 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89953777881 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.0780509296 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253520133694 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892935276808 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491760756647 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153619692628 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183073198494 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.