Space exploration requires vast sums of money and should be spent on more important things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, with the development of technology, scientists and government have invested in exploring outer space. I believe that space exploration wastes a lot of time, finance, and effort to conduct and should care about other issues.
On the one hand, various reasons explain why discovering new planets cost an arm and a leg endeavor. First and foremost, efforts and spending resources on discovering new planets are time-consuming and run out of fossil fuels. Instead of flying into the galaxy to explore new sources, we should use these resources and our intelligence to find better ways to power humanity's insatiable desire for energy. Furthermore, astronauts may deal with various risks in the spaceship and outer space. It contains several issues, such as running out of energy, and collision with meteorites. Therefore, space exploration poses heavy burdens on finance and labor for governments.
It seems to me that scientists and authorities should pay more attention to the concerning issues. The first reason is the poverty and shortage of food because many people live in unhygienic conditions, and do not have enough money to buy food. Therefore, spending money on supporting finances and free meals reduces the number of starving. Nevertheless, several nations have faced environmental issues; for instance, solving the long-last climate change and global warming needs more sums to take action and announce campaigns "go green" to the citizens. Finally, public facilities being out of order need replacing new ones, such as parks or hospitals to improve the standard of living.
To conclude, spending public funds on important objects around us is better than wasting to see unknown space objects. Making the best things to live is more important and should be the main concern of humanity.
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 81
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the rate of violent crime in society Do you agree or diagree 74
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 anf in 2010 70
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 100
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: OUT_OF_PLACE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'out-of-order'?
Suggestion: out-of-order
...izens. Finally, public facilities being out of order need replacing new ones, such as parks ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35191637631 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81661577612 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648083623693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0117098587 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191606723061 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595692242723 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526684619521 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120761630217 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454150904758 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.