In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this case?
What can be done about this problem?
Developments of agriculture technology nowadays represent many various methods which can apply to produce foods. However, in fact it is not happened because we saw some news showing famine issue. For sure, this phenomenon causes tragedy such as deaths and illness in some parts of the world.
We can see around us that directly it is not happened because the problem is just represented at condition of poor people. The number of foods which is produced using technology cannot be reached by them. Therefore, it is limited to be consumed people if they have no access to get food. For instance, Because Scavengers fails to sell their thing, they cannot purchase something to have for the day, they will be hungry whereas many foods in food store. Another reason, Distribution of food has effect to supply to society resulting scarcity. For example, the scarcity of cooking oil in Indonesia is happened because of limited distribution of palm oil.
To solve the issue, I propose a great solution that everyone can help though making collaboration which is facilitated by social community. They may need to establish new group doing survey or investigation about the number of people needing help. For example, there is community like AhmadPeduli on Instagram, which helps starving people. On other hand, the local government need to collect data in its region while distributing foods. We can see Gorontalo city recently sharing basic needs to society as monthly programme.
In short, the situation of each people is different to obtain enough food whereas there are many supplies in this world. While some parts of society get problem about famine, all of public sectors is hoped to help to solve it. People and government have role each for helping them.
- In many countries more and more young people are unable to find jobs after graduation What are the possible reasons for this change what are the solutions for this 56
- There have been major advances in technology over recent decades and this has led to significant improvements in people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara Desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 61
- Today more people are travelling than ever before Why is this the case What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to starve' or 'starve'.
Suggestion: to starve; starve
...e AhmadPeduli on Instagram, which helps starving people. On other hand, the local govern...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnment have role each for helping them.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07216494845 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62870201407 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7716212225 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.8235294118 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163595077384 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491082298147 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456963701049 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102223213405 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383640262626 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.