Sports stars are paid too much for what they do. Discuss.
These days, most sports stars are earning a fortune amount of money. Most athletes in sports such as football, basketball, and mixed martial arts (MMA) can be seen having luxury lives, owning brand-new cars, stunning mansions, and other properties. However, some people believe athletes do not deserve their income. I am completely against this idea and in this essay, I will support my view by giving examples.
Firstly, sports stars are paid what they generate. In other words, their representative teams are making massive revenues each year. Earnings come from different perspectives such as broadcasting licenses, sponsorship deals, press conferences, social media, and so on. Even more, stadiums are packed with thousands of spectators in every tournament worldwide. Therefore, athletes are getting paid according to the demand of the sports market.
Another reason why I disagree is that professional sportsmen have sacrificed a lot in their personal lives. Since playing games involve traveling, they are forced to flee from their parents, partners, and kids. Moreover, most athletes need to take advantage of ranking at the top spot by abandoning their education opportunities in their childhood. What’s more, the lives of sports stars and famous musicians and actors are quite similar too. Extreme success and fame diminish the privacy and safety of a person. Whenever they go out, they face paparazzi, supporters, and interviewers everywhere.
On the other hand, some people say sports stars are even more paid than other critical jobs in our society and world such as doctors, engineers, and scientists. A proportion of their income can be spent on serious matters like poverty, education, eco-friendly projects, and more. So, they firmly think that our society should prioritize other crucial parts than entertainment.
To conclude, global athletes have made a huge dedication and given a concerted effort to make a pro. Millions of people find watching sports entertaining and inspiring especially in this hectic era. Personally, I believe sports stars truly deserve their income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | Celina Pei | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Mai Clover | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts stars truly deserve their income.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51076923077 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7955061148 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658461538462 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3893694904 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2857142857 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4761904762 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229360614323 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711750872214 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102156158208 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119621601677 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375688799002 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.