Students in university should be specialized in one subject rather than to develop a wider range of many different subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
In contemporary society, there is consensus growing about the university students’ choices for their subjects due to its tremendous influence. People are divided into alternative opinion whether student should major one subject or learn a variety of subjects. To the best of my knowledge, I am biased towards latter opinion and the following paragraphs will explain further.
Initially, it is essential to recognize that traditional manufacturing economy has developed into knowledge based economy, which means that students focusing on one subject are more likely to take up decent jobs in the future. As the result of increasingly competitive labor markets, specialization is considered as supplementary elements for candidates in creating impression to employers. Moreover, with the knowledge of core subjects that students learn in the university can they become professionals afterwards. There is an undeniable fact that the time in university is so limited that if students do not concentrate on one field, they may not gain a deeper understanding of this field. A good case in this point is that there is little possibility to students to become prestigious physicians if they do not devote themselves to the core subjects.
On the flip side, it is equally pivotal to acknowledge that learning full range of subjects could train students to become well-rounded individuals. As a result of participating subjects that they have no experiences in, it could bring great opportunities for students to respond with unprecedented challenges and could make students capable of tacking all kind of problems in life. Therefore, learning all subjects is helpful of development of various personality aspects in students. Apart from this, developing a wider range of subjects exposes students to many more new ideas and makes them acquire a multidimensional understanding of current issues, which will definitely promote innovation in their future career.
Beyond and doubt, it is obvious that although focusing on one subject can make students become professionals in the future, participating all subjects is more beneficial for them in the long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-05 | maikhanh29194 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects, while others claim that students should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find interesting. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 73
- Students in university should be specialized in one subject rather than to develop a wider range of many different subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
- Students in university should be specialized in one subject rather than to develop a wider range of many different subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53012048193 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23613426153 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0552369796 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.230769231 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270488061872 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940469114274 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442118722818 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153881754382 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435901888961 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.