Successful companies use advertisements to make more sales. What can make an
advertisement effective? Do you think advertisements are a bad thing or a good thing for society?
In the present, the majority of prestigious organizations or companies are utilizing advertisements in order to make more sales. This essay will look into the principle resources, which can make adverts effective, as well as its role in society. However, I consider that advertisements are not a beneficial thing for the public.
On the one side, there are numerous resources for making advertising effective. The first and foremost one is money, which performs a fundamental role in the social lifespan of individuals. Mainly because decorations, transport, clothing expenditures, that can be quintessential in spite of creating a new advert requires a plethora of cash. The second thing is offering famous and notable actors, actresses, or qualified sportsmen, who are famous among the residents for advertising is the most significant way of engaging the audience's attention to the products. For instance, nowadays, prominent football stars are advertising "Coca Cola" drink and "LAYS" crisps, and these products are highly preferring by habitants. Therefore, these two things are extremely necessary for the representation of quality productions.
On the other side, adverts are not beneficial for society. That is because it is wasting money on unnecessary elements, which can injure the health of humans by their harmful content. For example, there are a plethora of carbohydrates in the content of these effervescent drinks, which are advertising on television, and this substance can cause obesity, high blood pressure, or other diseases. Furthermore, individuals should select and eat home-made, healthful meals, instead of advertising products on social media.
In conclusion, lots of cash and notable people are the principal resources of advertisement, however, adverts are not beneficial for the public because of some of the disadvantages for the health.
- The diagram shows the relationship between a number of different languages 72
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is this case What can be done to attract more local people 84
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 91
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
...he most significant way of engaging the audiences attention to the products. For instance...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s;LAYS' crisps, and these products are highly preferring by habitants. Therefore, these two thin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ot beneficial for the public because of some of the disadvantages for the health.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the disadvantages for the health.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73498233216 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30921699269 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8604844304 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273801390235 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991709169489 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805822361296 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166299759251 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963194167037 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.