Task 2
The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that the best way to enhance road safety is to serve stringent punishments for not following the driving rules. This essay completely agrees with the notion as fear of punishment could oblige people to follow the rules and also it could reduce the number of accident victims.
On implementing strict punishments on driving offenses, people would start to respect all the traffic rules and regulations inorder to avoid getting punished. For instance, when Malaysia imposed high penalty amount on traffic rules violations such as disrespecting signals, drunken drive and overspeed, public started to follow the driving criteria and the number of such offenses had been reduced to a great extent. This improvement was mainly due to people's fear of getting penalised for their reckless mistakes and they began to rectify them. Henceforth, the idea of admitting heavy punishments for driving crimes would be definitely beneficial.
Meanwhile, road traffic accidents can be decreased by serving strict punishments. For example, in India, bureaucrats brought a rule of wearing helmet strictly by bicycle riders, few years ago, also, they imposed six months of imprisonment for the violation. As a result, bicycle accidents were reduced. Even if accidents happened, people were not severely injured because of helmet. This is an another great advantage of implementing heavy punishments on driving related crimes.
In conclusion, inflicting terrible punishments on driving offenses is the only measure to improve road safety. This notion is completely acceptable as people would respect driving rules out of fear and it could decline the rate of accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-17 | nhiunbtran2011 | 61 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | Ishwarya Thavasi | 61 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 56
- Task 2 ln most of the societies the role of mother ond father differs What are the causes of this difference What will be the parental roles in future 56
- Many people can t speak or present well in public therefore it is vital to start the training from school Is it important to speak well in public Do you agree or disagree with the given opinion 56
- Task 2 There have been many inventions in human history such as the wheel Some people think the most important thing is the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest of our lives while others believe that adult life brings more happiness 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...due to peoples fear of getting penalised for their reckless mistakes and they beg...
^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a great' or 'another great'.
Suggestion: a great; another great
...rely injured because of helmet. This is an another great advantage of implementing heavy punishm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would respect driving rules out of fear and it could decline the rate of acciden...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50387596899 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79800937077 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6881866489 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.230769231 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174033483595 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683462273764 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732860541243 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120612293745 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511674146598 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.