Televised talent shows have become popular in many societies today. Are these shows a good method of finding talented people, or are they just entertainment?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this day and age, the demand for entertainment has constantly increased, resulting in a rise in the number of talent competitions broadcast on television. While a part of people believe that these programs are an effective way of seeking for new gifted artists, I individually consider them to be solely entertainment.
First of all, the unfairness in talent shows is always a hotly-debated topic on social media. Compared to those who have beautiful visuals or touching stories, gifted contestants without striking appearances have less airtime and media coverage. This puts them at a disadvantage when performing the audience voting round. Even in many programs, the winners are pre-determined at the beginning, so real talented people do not get a chance to show their abilities and receive what they deserve. By way of illustration, the director of a 2018 reality competition show called Produce48 admitted manipulating the result. The capable participants were eliminated while the pretty but incompetent girls debuted as an idol group.
On the other hand, televised contests tend to focus on creating drama in order to grab people's attention instead of their original purposes. By evilly editing, heated debates will appear widespread on social media such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, to name but a few. Many people will notice the controversy and become curious, therefore, the number of views will have enormous growth bringing more benefits for producers. Chasing tastes and profits keep these shows evolving in the right direction. This is true of The Face Vietnam, which is a reality television modeling competition series.
In conclusion, the truthfulness of finding-talent shows does not be ensured because of commercial purposes. Throughout the contest, more or less, there are deliberate arrangements of the operations and results. I can firmly say that this kind of TV program is not a real playground for the gifted, and so, we should consider it as an interesting approach to entertainment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | Bibek Regmi | 11 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | ththienan | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-16 | Annnnnnnn | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 78
- Some of people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefits more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3679245283 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09881208969 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647798742138 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4338964137 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197875761799 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560478700469 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473519410397 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110973587257 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192044491275 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.