There is a gap in standard of living between countryside and cities. How true is this in your country? What measures should be taken to reduce this gap?
Modernization is the need of advancing twenty first century. In this era, every country is pacing towards development and villages are far behind in the race of being modern. This leads to widening the gap between country side and cities. This problem can be solved by taking some measures that are discussed further.
To begin with, the most prominent reason behind the difference in living standard of countryside and cities is the lack of investment in rural areas. According to the prevalent trend cities are developing and are equipped with all exotic facilities of luxuries just because millions of dollars are spent on the state-of-the-art buildings, malls and restaurants that give marvelous look to cities, whereas villages are still devoid of basic amenities of life. As, countries are developing urban areas which are already developed ignoring the rural areas that cannot be said to be developing even creating the immense difference in their living standards. In India, case in point, according to a survey, cities like Delhi, Chandigarh, and Mumbai are enjoying the big investments from the government and most of the villages are not facilitated with electricity supply.
Further, cities provide all facilities of modern generation at same time countryside not even having adequate water facilities and even are lagging behind in sanitation. Moreover, majority of villages don’t even have higher education institutions, thus villages lack behind in employment too. So, to solve this problem government must ensure the adequate facilities to countryside as well. Money must be spent equally on the development of rural areas and cities.
In a nut shell, all facilities must be provided equally to the rural areas as well as the urban areas. If not so the gap convergence between both areas will become impossible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-17 | vishal sachdeva | 69 | view |
- Some teachers think that a program of international exchange visits would benefit all teenage school students Do you think the benefits of such a program would outweigh any disadvantages 84
- Teachers used to convey information but now with wide resources of information there is no role for teachers to play in modern education Do you agree or disagree 78
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others think social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think schools should educate pupils according to their academic ability and others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in classroom at all costs and go back to teaching study skills. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
Modernization is the need of advancing twenty first century. In this era, every country is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...n is the need of advancing twenty first century. In this era, every country is pacing t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...till devoid of basic amenities of life. As, countries are developing urban areas w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, so, still, thus, well, whereas, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33676975945 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84402827505 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3106648978 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208767297102 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848734351575 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915151427156 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138539839646 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934690420602 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.