These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude?
Nowadays, people discard damaged objects as compared to past, people used to increase the longevity of the damaged things by repairing them. In my opinion, such trend is due to availability of disposable products and affluent nature of people. This attitude has led to increase in pollution.
Enhancement in technology has produced comfort in human life. In the past people used to repair products to increase durability. However, due to availability of disposable products, people are not concerned about repairing them. As an illustration, in rural areas of Pakistan, sweets were served on plates made of dried leaves from palm tree. After damage they were repaired by other dried leaves. But then these traditional plates were replaced by one time use plastic boxes. Furthermore, in advanced countries, people use objects that create ease in their life regardless of their price. To illustrate, in China, crockery is replaced by plastic disposable items, and they discard them after using as they cut out the hassle of washing. HENCE, PEOPLE PREFERS TO EASE THEIR LIFE BY using disposable objects rather than repairing old products.
Throwing damaged things away, rather than repairing, has increased pollution. This is due to lack of reusable products in markets. Nowadays, those items are preferred which can be disposed of. Such items are usually made of plastics. For instance, in the past people used to carry baskets made up of date leaves. But now plastic shopping bags are found everywhere, which has a profound hazardous impact on the environment.
To conclude, these days people throw damaged things away, whereas in the past, people used to keep them for a long time, by repairing them. In my view, this change has happened due to increased usage of disposable objects and nature of rich people. Such attitude has a detrimental impact on the environment by increasing pollution.
- Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree? 78
- It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that success is the best measure of intelligence whilst others think that intelligent can be measured in other ways. what is your opinion? 56
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty? How can this be solved? 73
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es made of dried leaves from palm tree. After damage they were repaired by other drie...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, then, whereas, for instance, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19607843137 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72273806598 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516339869281 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9500365413 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7142857143 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34195321675 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979969321917 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111205310956 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245625530141 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107270034189 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.