These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are the problems and solutions?
It is true that the “throw-away” culture has become increasingly commonplace since people tend to discharge their purchases as waste after a brief period of time. This tendency has negative impacts on both environments and consumers themselves. However, there are also viable solutions that need a joint effort of both government and purchasers to address the problems.
To commence with, “throw-away” culture has detrimental effects that need to be thoroughly considered. The first problem relates to the degradation of the environment. According to an independent study, the vast majority of waste people dispose of is non-biodegradable. For example, millions of shopping bags discharged every day worldwide are made of a non-biodegradable substance called polythene. In other words, most waste lasts for centuries before decomposing completely and therefore undoubtedly leads to soil pollution. Another issue correlated with this behavior is financial burdens. Allocating a huge sum of money to trending and novelty products is a waste of money. The negative habit of overspending is likely to get people into serious debt, especially adolescents who usually lack sufficient skills and experience in monetary management. Consequently, people might suffer from undesirable anxiety and depression.
However, there are preventive measures that can be promptly taken to mitigate the influences. First and foremost, governments should place strict constraints on the amount of non-biodegradable goods. To be more specific, taxes should be imposed on factories whose amount of products exceed the permitted quantity. Besides, governments can provide funds to encourage the ablest scientists to invent environmentally friendly materials. At the same time, consumers have the responsibility to raise their self-awareness by refraining from over-expenditure and practicing segregating waste into recyclable and non-recyclable ones.
In conclusion, while “throw-away” culture has exerted serious effects on both the environment and consumers, solutions to this problem will probably involve collaborative actions from the government and purchasers.
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are the problems and solutions 84
- The charts below show annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the Internet and what solutions can you suggest 67
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... their purchases as waste after a brief period of time. This tendency has negative impacts on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05555555556 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53633580077 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640522875817 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4699239986 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.944444444 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156876089976 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414470097331 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546559089832 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101611007796 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531995518274 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.57 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.