Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Advertising and marketing a product has become very essential for companies in order to get the high sales and the role of advertising in the sales is great than the needs of consumers. I personally agree with the opinion but before drawing a quick conclusion it needs to be discussed.
First of all, advertisements offer consumers to find out more about goods as well as alternative choice. It is useful for those who do not have enough time to seek for information about products they need. As a result, owing to the commercials producers will gain more consumers who are really profitable for companies as well as beneficial for spreading the products among population.
Secondly, it is a well-known fact that producers attempt to use a variety of methods in order to attract buyers. They spend a great deal of money for tempting advertisements such as attending famous actors in commercials has been successful in some buyers' choice, particularly for those who are really fan of them or people who follow regularly with fashion because of the advertising of modern products accompanies to fashion.
Furthermore, there are some poor individuals who suffer from pains and cannot afford to go to hospital. Due to commercials they would be able to discover the response of their needs. As a consequence, that would be useful for both the poor and producers, which means the role of advertisements is significantly higher in the real needs of the society.
On the other hand, an intencive growth of sales of people's main consumer products is a result of increasing their needs to them. The role of advertisement in this area is confined to help the buyer choose the best products.
All things considered, it seems to me that in order to get high sales and income, producers should advertise their needs widely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | khanhptk162 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Tahmid Rakin Siddiqui | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Tahmid Rakin Siddiqui | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | Dele Omo | 73 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 89
- Today, it is vitally weighty for developing advances in health, education and commerce countries and the affluent countries should engage more responsibility in helping to the poor nations in such areas. 78
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such as Australia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college or university. Why do so many people want to study in English? Why is English such an important international lang 67
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 83
- All Mc Donald outlets and other fast food restaurants must be closed down for they sell stomach aggressive foodAgree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fanned'.
Suggestion: fanned
..., particularly for those who are really fan of them or people who follow regularly ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93137254902 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92825958098 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4621256577 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18627579601 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682560711776 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472343141754 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10275947509 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037634831727 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.