Today, the life expectancy of people is much higher than before, some people think that older people should continue to be involved in the workforce. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, there are many people who take a healthy diet and do more exercise than ever before, which are reasons for an increment in life expectancy. While some people argue that older people need to participate more in the workforce. This essay will discuss why people think in this direction and why I disagree with them, all the explanations are given in the following paragraphs.
To comments with, since applying a healthy lifestyle in their lives, people become more physically and mentally strong enough to work for many years. Having the older generation in offices and factories will provide their experiences and guidance to younger ones, which is beneficial in terms of working conditions in rooms as well as improves productivity and creativity. As a result of research, for example, China suggested that younger people, if they working with older people or under them, they performed nearly 20% well in all situations than those who do not have mentors. Therefore, these types of evidence prove that having elders in the workforce is beneficial from a company’s point of view.
However, there are many drawbacks attach to this issue. If workforces filled up with people of the older age group, the younger ones will find many obstacles in getting employment. Moreover, it leads to serious tension in a particular country. Another one is young people are very familiar with new technology, which will bring efficiency and higher growth rates for companies and the economy. For instance, a survey by Google showed that new workers in their company performed higher than old workers. Despite having not more experience,
without any doubt, young people are always beneficial from all perspectives for organisations.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the advantages of having old people at factories, which worked as mentors for new ones and share their experiences. But younger generations are closer to modern technology, which improves a company's overall profits. In my words, although old age citizens are beneficial in many terms, younger ones are far better than them in employments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | bee nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | tvaishnavi | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | tvaishnavi | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-24 | Kishanpatel | 76 | view |
- The chart show fresh fruit exports in 2010 67
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need a dumb worker more do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 93
- Today the life expectancy of people is much higher than before Some people think that older people should continue to be involved in the workforces To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ns for an increment in life expectancy. While some people argue that older people nee...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers. Despite having not more experience, without any doubt, young people are alwa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26035502959 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74274876262 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5516485767 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217922824672 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759246330316 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690452826936 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132546053759 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762265649826 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.