In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is irrefutable that people nowadays are living in a world dominated by cutting edge technologies and scientific breakthroughs. Nonetheless, people working in the art fields still gain an honourable position in each individual's heart. That is due to the fact that arts can teach humanity a variety of valuable lessons that science and technology never could
On the one hand, arts can be a great way for people to inspect things in different aspects. While science-related fields consider thing by its intrinsic nature, artworks lead people to open their mind and think in various perspectives. An illustration of this is that when witnessing a cat, the scientists immediately identify it as a terrestrial quadrupedal animal, artists, on the contrary, see the cat as a creative influence. They could be a reliable friend, a fearless hero or a traditional symbol of some nations, to mention but a few. Through art, people have an opportunity to learn and to understand themselves that not possible before.
Furthermore, artworks instil religious and spiritual values into each individual. Its seems to be shreds of evidence that whilst science plays an essential role in raising people's physical life, the arts, on the other hand, are mainly responsible for the psychological element. It contributes to the comprehensive development of a human. Folk tales, which contain several ethic lessons about hospitality, sympathy or generosity, can be a suitable case in point. There is thousand of the child growing up with these stories which taught them to be a well-rounded person who has a passion and put their heart into it
In conclusion, from all these pre-mention reasons, there is undeniable that arts can tell us numerous things including thinking from a variety of diverse aspects as well as giving us all the religious as well as spiritual values, which we hardly ever seen in scientific researchesor technological projects
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 89
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sport shows why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of job should be highly paid 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ill gain an honourable position in each individuals heart. That is due to the fact that art...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ble lessons that science and technology never could On the one hand, arts can be a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...n be a suitable case in point. There is thousand of the child growing up with these stor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2347266881 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1167194445 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627009646302 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.567266982 49.4020404114 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188330343029 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547460996404 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514968552153 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112938461871 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051357879727 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.